MULTILITERACIES AND LEARNING: AN ANALYSIS OF AN ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FOR THE BRAZILIAN CONTEXT

Authors

  • Reinildes Dias UFMG
  • Daniela Gomes de Araújo Nóbrega UEPB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47180/omij.v3i1.157

Keywords:

Multiliteracies, Cycle of knowledge processes, Brazilian English textbooks

Abstract

This work investigates whether the theory of (multi)literacies and the cycle of knowledge processes underlie the pedagogical design of the English school textbook, XX. We engaged in a documentary analysis to interpret the data from one of its units. Results showed that the cycle of processes underlie the textbook learning activities in an appropriate way. We noticed, however, that it falls short in the choice of the genre for the writing section since it should have proposed a feature article that had been read and studied in the unit and not a flyer whose generic characteristics were unknown by the students at that point.  Concerning the multimodality approach, the layout orchestrates the multimodal resources effectively. The pedagogical design also focuses on the multimodal ensembles of meanings but lacks an emphasis on a metalanguage that could help students understand how and why they are created. Diversity, one of the aspects in the multiliteracies theory, is carefully weaved throughout the unit and focuses on students’ understanding and commitment to the multiple social and cultural differences of the present age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. MEC-FNDE. Edital de convocação 04/20xx para o processo de inscrição e avaliação de obras didáticas para o Programa Nacional do Livro Didático PNLD 20xx. Brasília: Ministério da Educação, Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Básica, 20xx.

______________. PNLD 2018: inglês – guia de livros didáticos –Ensino Médio/ Ministério da Educação – Secretária de Educação Básica – SEB –Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educação. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Educação, Secretária de Educação Básica.

COWEL, C. Seventeen Magazine Makes ‘Body Peace Treaty’. The Cut, 2012.

Available at: < https://www.thecut.com/2012/07/seventeen-magazine-makes-body-peace-treaty.html> Retrieved: April 12 2021.

DIAS, R.; JUCA, L.; FARIA, R. (2017) New High Up Student's Book with Digital Book. 1st ed. Macmillan Education Brasil. 336pgs.

DIAS, R. (2018). Entrevista. Polifonia, Cuiabá-MT, v. 25, n.37.1, p. 160-170.

HODGE, R.; KRESS, G. (1988) Social Semiotics. London: Polity Press.

KALANTZIS, M.; COPE, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 454 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196581

__________. (2010). The teacher as designer: pedagogy in the new media age. E-learning and digital media. 7(3), p. 200-222. 10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200

KRESS, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. 212p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

KRESS, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London and New York: Routledge. 208p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234

KRESS, G. Semiotic work: Applied Linguistics and a social semiotic account of Multimodality. (2015). AILA Review, Amsterdam, 28, doi 10.1075/aila.28.03kress. p. 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kre

__________; VAN LEEUWEN, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. 2. ed. London: Routledge. 312 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. (2003) Fundamentos de Metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

MODE. Glossary of multimodal terms, 2012. Available at:

https://multimodalityglossary.wordpress.com/. Retrieved 03 April 2021.

PRENSKY, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 204p.

ROCHA, C. H.; MACIEL, R. F. Franco; MORGAN, B. (2017). Critical perspectives in language education and literacies: discussing key concepts. Revista de Letras Norte@mentos. UNEMAT: Sinop, 10(23), p. 64-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30681/rln10232981

THE NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), p. 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

THIBAUT, P.; CURWOOD, J. S. (2018) Multiliteracies in Practice: Integrating Multimodal Production across the curriculum. Theory into Practice, 57(1) p. 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1392202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1392202

Downloads

Published

2022-05-27

How to Cite

Dias, R., & Nóbrega, D. G. de A. (2022). MULTILITERACIES AND LEARNING: AN ANALYSIS OF AN ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FOR THE BRAZILIAN CONTEXT. Open Minds International Journal, 3(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.47180/omij.v3i1.157